1.Criteria description：
A complete report is presented to an excellent standard with an original and detailed combination of team-level observations or individual observations will good details about what are the experience and how you or team managed those; as well as evaluations or reflections on the experience. Project critical success factors literature was well understood and studied to evaluate your experience and explored ‘why’ the experience. Meaningful recommendations for future practice, which are detailed enough for showing how exactly an issue could be dealt with. Such recommendations are clearly based on your experience and research, showing good guidance for your future study and practice. (Scoring details are in the attachment）
Tips:
1500 words +-10% (exclude reference list)
Times New Roman, Calibri font, size 12, Arial font, size 11, line spacing 1.5，Harvard format for references
Theoretical knowledge combined with real-life practice
2. Points of collection:
My role in the team is Scriptwriter, mid-term PPT and speechwriter. The results of the PPT are shown in the attachment. Other’s role include Video Capture & Edit, Voice Over, Researcher, Story-boarder, Producer, Interviewer, Planner.
① Observation/experience of a certain point:
What happened 10 marks
When did it happen/ In what situation it happened 3 marks
What is your/other’s role 2 marks
What did you or others do? 7 marks
At the moment: why or what were the motivations for you to do so? 8 marks
What are consequences of doing so? 15 marks\
② Evaluations and reflection:
A statement of :
Did it go well/wrong?/What was positive and negative? /The impacts on project delivery or you 5 marks
Detailed reflection:
Thinking back: Why it was well /not well?/What did you/others do well/not so well in the point you mentioned? 10 marks
What theory/research can also explain why this worked well/not well? 15 marks
③Recommendation–how to avoid this failure/continue the success
What would you do in a similar situation
Generalise the specific learning point/situation/events/ideas 5 marks
Detailed guidance of actions – What aspects of knowledge/skills do you want to develop/a step-by-step detailed method summarised 10 marks
Recommendations are supported by observation or literature 10 marks
3.Notes for your individual coursework:
You need to have both individual-level (yourself) and team-level (collective/others) learning in your report
You need to fulfil the lower marking criteria first, then you can be considered for the next level
For example, if your description of your events/experience is not detailed enough, even though you have a good analysis to literature, it will not be marked to 60
Good experience is also an important learning source
The nature of this report is self-reflection, so using first-person is allowed. However, your reflections cannot be subjective.
No plagiarism (including self-plagiarism)
