You are the fraud investigator on a case and you are certain the VP of Operations has embezzled funds. The VP of Operations has been under suspicion twice before on similar schemes but these suspicions were never proven. Do you think, in this case, it would be acceptable to include evidence from these prior situations in your investigation to ensure an arrest and conviction this time?
Analysis of : Deborah Tannen Fighting for Our Lives article
Purpose Deconstructing and analyzing arguments are the foundations of good argumentation. As Lazere posits, its not just about sounding good, it is about having a “sound argument”. Learning how to identify the claim, reasoning, and use of evidence will help you understand what constitutes fair arguments, in addition to creating