This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clear thesis statement at the end of a well-written and appropriate introduction 20.0 pts Strong thesis and intro 10.0 pts Vague thesis statement 0.0 pts No thesis statement; weak intro paragraph This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization: Paragraph division and transitions 30.0 pts Excellent paragraphs with well-crafted transitions 15.0 pts Weak or choppy paragraph divisions or abrupt transitions 0.0 pts No paragraph divisions or very chaotic organization This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of sentences 30.0 pts Very well crafted sentences 15.0 pts Decent sentences; some errors 0.0 pts Major sentence errors such as fragments, run-on sentences, or other major grammatic errors, such as lack of subject and verb or multiple comma splices. These errors undermine basic intelligibility. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of insight and analysis 20.0 pts Excellent insight with strong evidence of critical thinking 10.0 pts Solid insights; fulfills the basics of the assignment 0.0 pts Merely reports from other sources and one’s own critical thinking is not apparent
Academic Paper Metaphorically using your Belbin SPI questionnaire as an
Academic Paper Metaphorically using your Belbin SPI questionnaire as an appraisal instrument, i.e., a conceptual lens through which you will reflect on your past observations of people and their behaviour while working in teams, you must write an academic paper that addresses the following two tasks. Between the two main