Directions: There is so much information and misinformation on the web

Directions: There is so much information and misinformation on the web about health, nutrition, and fitness. When looking at resources, it is important to evaluate the credibility of a resource in order to determine the reliability of the information presented.

Review the document Evaluating Online Resources.  Then do an online search using the words “diet” and/or “nutrition”.  You can use www.google.com to do the search, or any other search engine of your choice.  From the results of your search, choose three websites that you would like to evaluate.  For each of the websites, answer the questions below and write a final recommendation on the website’s credibility.

Website #1:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website? (1 pt)

2.  As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc). (1 pt)

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)? (1 pt)

4.  Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information? (1 pt)

5.  Briefly review the information on the website.  Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition?  Explain. (1 pt)

6.  As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?  (1 pt)

7.  In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning. (2 pts)

Website #2:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website? (1 pt)

2.  As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc). (1 pt)

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)? (1 pt)

4.  Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information? (1 pt)

5.  Briefly review the information on the website.  Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition?  Explain. (1 pt)

6.  As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?  (1 pt)

7.  In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning. (2 pts)

Website #3:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website? (1 pt)

2.  As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc). (1 pt)

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)? (1 pt)

4.  Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information? (1 pt)

5.  Briefly review the information on the website.  Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition?  Explain. (1 pt)

6.  As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?  (1 pt)

7.  In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning. (2 pts)

Final Recommendations: Of the websites you reviewed, which sites would you deem as credible and which did you think were less than credible? (1 pt)

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is crucial for me to ensure that my students are equipped with the skills to evaluate the credibility of online resources related to health, nutrition, and fitness. In this assignment, I asked my students to conduct an online search using the keywords “diet” and/or “nutrition” and choose three websites to evaluate for their credibility. In this document, I will provide answers to the questions posed in the assignment for each of the three websites chosen.

Website #1:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website?
http://www.nutrition.gov/

2. As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc).
The website belongs to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)?
The extension on the web address is “.gov”.

4. Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information?
The site is supplying information and resources related to nutrition.

5. Briefly review the information on the website. Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition? Explain.
The information on the website is comprehensive and covers a wide range of topics related to nutrition. The information is in line with the information learned in section 4.1 on nutrition.

6. As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?
The information on the website is based on scientific facts and from credible resources, such as the USDA and the National Institutes of Health.

7. In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning.
I would rate this website as “very credible” as it is maintained by a government agency with a mandate to provide accurate and reliable information related to nutrition.

Website #2:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website?
https://www.webmd.com/diet/default.htm

2. As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc).
The website belongs to WebMD.

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)?
The extension on the web address is “.com”.

4. Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information?
The site is primarily supplying information and resources related to diet and nutrition, but it also has advertisements for various products.

5. Briefly review the information on the website. Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition? Explain.
The information on the website is comprehensive and covers a wide range of topics related to nutrition. The information is generally in line with the information learned in section 4.1 on nutrition, but there are some areas where the information is not as scientifically rigorous.

6. As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?
The information on the website is based on scientific facts and from credible resources, such as the American Heart Association and Mayo Clinic.

7. In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning.
I would rate this website as “moderately credible” as it is maintained by a reputable health website, but the presence of advertisements for various products raises some concerns about the impartiality of the information provided.

Website #3:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website?
https://www.juicediet.com/

2. As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc).
The website belongs to Juice Diet, Inc.

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)?
The extension on the web address is “.com”.

4. Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information?
The site is promoting a specific product, i.e., the juice diet.

5. Briefly review the information on the website. Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition? Explain.
The information on the website is primarily focused on promoting the juice diet and its benefits. The information is not in line with the information learned in section 4.1 on nutrition, as the juice diet is not a scientifically proven or widely accepted dietary regimen.

6. As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?
The information on the website is not based on scientific facts or from credible resources.

7. In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning.
I would rate this website as “probably not very credible” as it is primarily focused on promoting a specific product and the information presented is not based on scientific facts or credible resources.

Final Recommendations:
Based on my evaluation of the three websites, I would deem the USDA’s nutrition.gov website and WebMD’s diet and nutrition section to be credible sources of information, whereas juicediet.com is not a credible source of information. It is important for individuals to evaluate the credibility of online resources and to rely on scientifically supported information when making decisions related to health and nutrition.

#Directions #information #misinformation #web

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

This section Must be HANDWRITTEN (use the PNII Handwritten requirements

This section Must be HANDWRITTEN (use the PNII Handwritten requirements template provided above for this section): Provide at least one reference and citation For each disease process, list at LEAST: 3 things you would monitor/reassess, 3 things you would do or action, 3 things you would teach your patient, 3

Write a response to the following prompt in a minimum

  Write a response to the following prompt in a minimum of 175 words: Chrome Remote Desktop by Google™ lets users sign into remote computers through a Chrome browser. This blend of cloud computing technology and remote desktop access can be handy when you need to support computers that use

The purpose of this assignment is to help you break

The purpose of this assignment is to help you break down the final Individual Portfolio Project into smaller tasks and to obtain instructor feedback for each step. Additional information to address in the paper includes: An overview of the client; A detailed explanation of the investment policy statement based on

. Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on

.  Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient(s) and the organization it affects. 1.  Identify the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem: •   patient/population/problem (P) •   intervention (I) •   comparison (C) •   outcome (O) 2.  Develop an evidence-based practice (EBP)

Species Briefing Report Assignment

For this report you will select a California native plant or an introduced alien plant that is causing problems for California ecosystems, conduct research on the plant, and write a short briefing report. The report should be around 800 words in length, excluding citations. You may include a few selected

Individually begin your literature review by undertaking a Nursing Assignment Help

Individually begin your literature review by undertaking a search for empirical evidence that supports your theory. Each student will individually find 3-4 scholarly articles to identify how this theory was used and tested, including whether it is used for an intervention study, how the constructs (concepts) of the theory were measured, and whether the

need to write 2 to 3 pages already 2 pages

need to write 2 to 3 pages already 2 pages I had already written but this things below needed to be included  team assignment part is very generic. Please read what Mohammed is written, those are specific points. Assignment 2 should be detailed and not generic. You haven’t used any

Learning Resources Required Readings Reupert, A. (2007). Social worker’s use

  Learning Resources Required Readings Reupert, A. (2007). Social worker’s use of self. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35(2), 107–116. Van Voorhis, R. M., & Hostetter, C. (2006). The impact of MSW education on social worker empowerment and commitment to client empowerment through social justice advocacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(1), 105–121. Required Media

Each paragraph holds one main idea and its supporting details

  Each paragraph holds one main idea and its supporting details and/or evidence. The goal of the body paragraphs is to prove each point of the thesis. For this discussion, you will be writing one of the body paragraphs.  Start by choosing one of the points from the map you wrote for the

2022- 2021 Assets Current Assets$9,630$8,710 Property, plant, and equipment (net)2,000/1,850

2022- 2021 Assets Current Assets$9,630$8,710 Property, plant, and equipment (net)2,000/1,850 Other assets1,530/1,600 Total assets$13,160/$12,160 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current Liabilities$3,240/$3,330 Long-term liabilities1,290/1,350 Stockholders’ equity8,6307,540 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$13,160/$12,160 (a) Prepare a horizontal analysis of the balance sheet data for Nike, using 2021 as a base. (b) Prepare a vertical

175- to 260-word reflection of your experience in the BSHM

   175- to 260-word reflection of your experience in the BSHM program in which you: Consider all of the courses and content you have learned in the program. What course or course content will be most helpful in your future role? How will you apply the knowledge you have gained

Assignment Content Imagine you are a quality leader for a

Assignment Content Imagine you are a quality leader for a health care organization, and you have been asked to create a document for new employees to introduce the basic concepts of risk and quality management. Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you address the following: Explain basic concepts

CLSPRCC assessment brief: Evaluate your role in this situation and how

Task 1 – 3000 word assignment. A written assignment adopting a case study approach that facilitates the critical analysis and evaluation of leadership demonstrated in the safe and effective delivery of evidence based care.   This task is designed to meet the following module learning outcomes. ·         Critically review and

Instructions You have read about employee development in the organizational

   Instructions You have read about employee development in the organizational setting. As part of your training, you are required to give a PowerPoint presentation to departmental managers throughout the organization, keeping the following thought in mind: Many companies don’t want to invest money in training because they believe it

In 2018, the town of Prattville erected a monument with

  In 2018, the town of Prattville erected a monument with the 10 Commandments inscribed on its face.  A private citizen donated the monument to the city, which was placed in the town square next to several bronze statues of children playing with balls and leaves. A town resident filed

Discussion: Assessing Outcomes How do you determine the “success” of

Discussion: Assessing Outcomes How do you determine the “success” of a human services program? Part of your role as an administrator is to collaborate with your staff to determine how a particular program’s effectiveness will be measured. The outcomes must be clear, realistic, and feasible, and how the outcomes will

please complete attachment A case study involving some social media

please complete attachment  A case study involving  some social media or privacy situations where a student will describe  the event, what he or she believes was wrong on the part of the actors  concerning the relevant stakeholders and what actions, based on a  personal moral compass, would have led to