Assignment Instructions: reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.
Discuss at least three of the following in your paper:
•Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.
•Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?
•The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.
•Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections. Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style.
LINKS YOU MIGHT NEED FOR THIS ASSIMENT:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjects
https://grants.nih.gov/policy/hs/faqs.htm
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As medical professionals, it is important to understand and respect the rights of human research participants. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has provided valuable information regarding the protection of these rights. In this reflective paper, we will discuss the circumstances that led to the need for policies to protect human research subjects, the vulnerable populations that require special restrictions, the core principles of the Belmont Report and their order of importance, and the significance of understanding these rights and protections.
Circumstances that influenced the need for policies to protect human research subjects:
The need for policies to protect human research subjects arose due to the unethical practices followed by researchers in the past. Many human research participants were subjected to harmful treatments and procedures without their informed consent. For instance, the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment conducted by the US Public Health Service kept 600 black men with syphilis untreated for decades, without their informed consent. Such instances led to the creation of policies and guidelines to protect human research participants. Researchers are now required to get informed consent from participants before conducting any research, and can only conduct research involving human subjects after rigorous ethical review and approval.
Examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers:
There are several ways in which human research subjects can be harmed by researchers. One of the most significant ways is through physical harm. This can include physical injuries, exposure to harmful substances, or even death. Additionally, human research subjects can suffer mental and emotional harm, such as psychological trauma, anxiety, depression, or loss of dignity. The lack of adequate disclosure of information about the research study by the researcher can also cause harm to the participant. Finally, the confidentiality of research subjects must be maintained, as breaches of confidentiality can lead to serious social, employment, and legal consequences.
Identifying vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups:
Vulnerable populations are those who are at increased risk of being harmed by researchers, due to their position of marginalization or disadvantage. These populations include children, pregnant women, prisoners, and individuals with mental disabilities or diminished autonomy. The restrictions associated with human research among these groups include informed parental consent for minors, additional scrutiny of research involving pregnant women, and rigorous ethical review of research involving prisoners.
Evaluating the requirements and restrictions:
The requirements and restrictions are designed to protect vulnerable populations who would otherwise be subjected to harm by researchers. While they are adequate, it is important to ensure that they are consistently enforced and updated to reflect changing societal and medical norms.
Prioritizing the core principles of the Belmont Report:
The core principles of the Belmont Report are respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. While all three principles are crucial in research, beneficence is the most important of all. This principle emphasizes the importance of minimizing harm and maximizing benefits to research participants.
Significance of understanding these rights and protections:
It is essential for medical professionals to understand these rights and protections, as they may be involved in conducting research involving human subjects. Adhering to ethical guidelines not only protects research participants but also ensures the integrity and trustworthiness of the research results. Understanding these protections also respects human dignity and individual autonomy.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, protecting the rights of human research subjects is crucial in maintaining the ethical standards of medical research. Understanding the policies, requirements, and restrictions put in place to safeguard these rights is essential for all medical professionals to conduct ethical research. By prioritizing beneficence and understanding the significance of these rights and protections, we can ensure the ethical conduct of medical research.
#Assignment #Instructions #reflect #learned #NIH
