Court Case Review

 Objective: Students need to demonstrate an understanding of evidence admissibility laws and how they evolve over time. The report should focus on the legal arguments of the cases. Formatting and length requirements: •APA formatting and citation for any source used (see https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for a good APA guide). This includes a reference list and in-text citation. You do not need an abstract for this assignment. •Every source you use, including the textbook, needs to be cited in your reference list. Each reference list entry must have a corresponding in-text citation. •12 pt. Times New Roman font. •Double-spaced with 1-inch margins. •Three pages of content (750 words). Do not include your title page or reference list in your page count. Do not use excessive quotes. If you can re-state something in your own words, do so. You can go over this word count, if needed. Content: •Select a case from the list below and write a short summary of the case. Answer the following: ◦Who were the parties involved? ◦What was the case about? ◦What was the main legal issue and how was it resolved? What were the legal arguments? ◦How did the case impact forensic evidence admissibility or expert testimony? •Do some research and select a past or a more recent case that is related to your selected case. This case should relate to the rules of admissibility from your original case. For the case you select, be sure to answer the following: ◦Who were the parties involved? ◦What was the case about? ◦What was the main legal issue and how was it resolved? What were the legal arguments? ◦How did the case impact forensic evidence admissibility or expert testimony? ◦For a past case, answer at least one of the below questions: ◾In what way did your selected case change/challenge (e.g. the past case allowed X but your case established X was not allowed or vice versa) the past case? ◾OR in what way did your selected case build upon (e.g. past cases said a judge can only rule on established scientific techniques, but your case allowed judges to rule on both new techniques and established scientific techniques) the past case? ◦For a more recent case, answer at least one of the below questions: ◾How has the recent case built upon your selected case (e.g. a new technique was accepted as admissible evidence in the recent case because your selected case established the admissibility of the evidence)? ◾OR how has the recent case changed/challenged your selected case (e.g. your selected case stated X was not admissible, but the recent case accepted X as admissible evidence)? ◦Legal arguments: Be sure to concentrate on the legal arguments, both for and against changing the admissibility rule(s). Legal arguments against can be as simple as ‘this piece of evidence was never used before’, to arguments about the statistical sample used to prove the scientific technique, to questions about the validity of the method used. Legal arguments for can be as simple as ‘it has been used in another place by law enforcement agencies’, to ‘it has been used in courts before for X’, to proving the validity of the method used. Cases (pick one): Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) (general admissibility) Andrews v. State of Florida, 533 So. 2d 841 Fla. Dist. Ct. App. (1988) (DNA) People v. Jennings, 252 Ill. 534, 96 N.E. 1077 (1911) (fingerprints) Selecting your research case: •The research case should connect with one of the cases above in terms of rules of admissibility. So, if you select People v. Jennings, your research case should be centered around the admissibility of fingerprint evidence. In other words, for a more recent case, you need to find a case that either built upon the admissibility of fingerprint evidence or challenged the validity of fingerprint evidence. Alternatively, if you are using a past case, your research case needs to either be a basis for the legal arguments for or against the validity of fingerprint evidence. •Your research case: ◦SHOULD center around admissibility of evidence as a whole. For example, if you picked Andrews v. State of Florida, your research case should center on whether the court should trust the validity of DNA evidence or explored the validity of a new way of analyzing DNA evidence. ◦SHOULD NOT be about the use of faulty evidence or about the rules of admissibility excluding inappropriate evidence. For example, the Mayfield case would be inappropriate as it is about the use of low quality fingerprint evidence, not the validity of fingerprint evidence. ◦CAN be about the admissibility of a new technique. For example, your research case can be a case that focuses on the validity of a new way to collect or analyze DNA evidence if you pick Andrews v. State of Florida. ◦CANNOT be about how forensic evidence exonerated someone or solved a case. Keep in mind the objective of this paper is to show you understand how rules of admissibility change over time.

#Court #Case #Review

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

The Evolving Landscape of Healthcare Delivery Models Nursing Assignment Help

I’m working on a health & medical discussion question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. In the context of evolving healthcare delivery models and the increasing role of advanced practice nurses, how can nurse practitioners effectively collaborate with other healthcare professionals, such as physicians, pharmacists, and

1. Provide an example of the upside of risk and

1. Provide an example of the upside of risk and explain the concept. 2. Explain how Enterprise Risk Management varies from traditional risk management? 3. What are five examples of internal and external drivers of an organization’s risk culture? 4. Provide an example company, give a description of the organization

Read this article and answer the questions listed below: When

  Read this article and answer the questions listed below:  When Not to Promote to Manager 1.    Do you think taking a management position is, “a necessary step of upward progression in a person’s career”? 2.    In your opinion, What should be considered in selection for management roles?  3.    Does your organization offer

Choose two peers to review their video. Make sure they

  Choose two peers to review their video. Make sure they are peers from two different groups. Peer Reviews Each student must respond to two peers’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 PM ET, providing a short explanation with an evidence-based rationale to the statement.  The student may use the required

Ways of collecting data

As you discussed in this unit’s Discussion Board, survey research is one of the most common ways of collecting data. However, not all survey research is created equal. In this activity, your task is to collect at least 5 different examples of surveys used by local police agencies. Using these

How does today’s stereotyping, bias and racial profiling intersect with

  How does today’s stereotyping, bias and racial profiling intersect with religion? Are personal opinions fueled by social media outlets affecting how we understand or view religious beliefs? Use examples from society to support your thoughts on this topic.  You must support your response with scholarly sources in APA format. 

Explore how financing decisions can have an impact on the firm (i.e.

Explore how financing decisions can have an impact on the firm (i.e. how much debt a company uses relative to equity) affect the company’s risk, average cost of capital and hence the company’s value? If an optimum financing mix exists (i.e. one that gives a minimum WACC), then it would

No AI  PLEASE SEND TURNITIN REPORT  Write a paper identifying techniques that could be done to disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline. Please include free

No AI  PLEASE SEND TURNITIN REPORT  Write a paper identifying techniques that could be done to disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline. Please include free or low-cost techniques, as well as more in-depth, systemic-level techniques that can lead to change. Please be creative and concise. More specifically, please address the following points in your paper: Post

Explain the positive and negative aspects of the living arrangements

  Explain the positive and negative aspects of the living arrangements for the elderly listed below. Be sure to thoroughly evaluate each option. Living in own home Living with their children Assisted living facility Nursing home with intermediate care Nursing home with skilled nursing care and make recommendations for healthy

Ronald Reagan, the 40th president of the United States, has

Ronald  Reagan, the 40th president of the United States, has been described as  having had a very engaging personality. Even people who disagreed with  his policies, found themselves drawn to his attractive and carefully  honed public image. Surrounded by tough, energetic administrators who  insulated him from many of the pressures

To understand boundary setting in naturalistic inquiry, select a public

To understand boundary setting in naturalistic inquiry, select a public place, such as a shopping venue, social media site, or restaurant. Spend at least 1 hour observing, and then determine patterns of human behavior in the context. Look at the artifacts/images and how they are used. As you observe, record

CALUMS Teratogens Short and Long Term Impacts Essay Nursing Assignment Help

Assessment Description Physical development in the womb has a strong impact on future physical, cognitive, emotional and social development throughout the lifespan. There are many toxins in the environment that can impact physical development and have a long-term impact. For this essay, you will examine the short-term and long-term impact

comment from post 6 Nursing Assignment Help

I find malnutrition a very frustrating topic.  In countries rich with food supplies people suffer from malnutrition due to financial, educational or personal choice deficits.  In countries with poor food supplies there seems to be the same issues only added to the mix are religious beliefs that block some forms