Add to these posts with journal article as a reference.
Post One :
Comments on key findings
There is a significant improvement of preparedness to disaster by individual hospitals since the start of the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP); I will comment that quality and safe services have been guaranteed to patients or victims of disasters. Since disaster planning programs started in 2002, the individual hospitals have received training and tools to handle emergencies. Private hospitals and organizations are community-based organs that respond quickly to disaster and have more information about the community than the public hospitals. Thanks to UPMC for findings that help the government to implement disaster and response programs.
The Coalitions of Emergency response teams are building a foundation for preparedness; Health facilities have formed coalitions in the effort of strengthening the disaster preparedness services through sharing the HPP programs. Collaborations and coordination between hospitals, both private and public have enhanced the emergency and disaster response teams’ operations. Through the networking of hospitals, training and tools or resources have been shared or acquired. I comment that both the private and public hospitals have played a significant role in enhancing all-disaster preparedness. I congratulate the UPMC for engaging the government for such quality research that has enlightened the healthcare field. Better services are now a guarantee to victims whenever they occur.
In our hospital, the funding sources are well established non-profit organizations based on healthcare services. The government is part of the funding source to our emergency management programs. We also receive grants from individual well-wishers. Stakeholders play a significant role in opening channels through which funds come to our facility to serve our people. Our facility is private and has sustained the quality level of services through such support from other non-governmental organizations. We hope to deliver the best quality and safe services in the future to help our people.
References
Toner E, Waldhorn R, Franco C, Courtney B, Rambhia K, Norwood A, Inglesby TV, O’Toole T.
(2009). Hospitals rising to the challenge: The first five years of the U.S. hospital preparedness program and priorities going forward Prepared by the Center for Biosecurity of UPMC for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under Contract No. HHSO100200700038C.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
Response: Strategic Plan 2010 – 2015.
Post Two:
Comment on one of the key findings described in the Toner et al. document.
My most focus this semester is the individual preparedness of the hospital regarding emergencies. I choose to focus on the first critical findings in Toner document “disaster preparedness of individual hospitals has improved significantly throughout the country since the start of HPP” (Toner et al., 2009). In this finding, individual hospitals in the US increased emergency preparedness by engaging top leaders such as CEO in planning for disaster preparedness and response, established situational awareness and communication capability to increase efficiency, and improved on the dynamics of disaster planning. Before 2002, individual hospitals had little emergency preparedness, and the introduction of the health development program has agitated the need to be prepared to mitigate emergency impacts and hospital operations. Post-2002, senior leadership has recognized the need for emergency preparedness and developed a new perception of what disaster can cause. The results of the preparedness have been investments to avail resources, rigorous coordination with community emergency plans such with the fire departments, increases quality planning from coordinators, training to staff on specific responsibilities and role in the event of a disaster, improved communication agencies with hospital departments among others. From my analysis, individual hospital preparedness has evolved compared to the past perceptions that were inclined to emergencies.
Identify other funding sources for your hospital emergency management projects.
Individual Hospital management on emergency is expensive. However, hospitals can cover some expenses directly from the facility while others require funding from outside sources such as Feds. Also, commitment from the state, local and federal government bodies is essential to facilitate preparedness in hospital and protect the social welfare of Americans as well as across the globe (Public Health Emergency, 2019). Fundings have to be in the form of resources and equipment’s useful for prevention and responding to emergencies. For example, funding to avail vaccines is a mitigating measure while funding for new construction of a facility is as a result of the occurrence of a disaster.
HHS BARDA: in partnership with public health vaccine to fund a vaccine against Marburg and other related bioterrorism infections to offer a solution in America and across the globe.
Competitive grants from the state, federal, and private organizations are issued to assist in planning and mitigating emergencies such as fire or natural disasters.
- Charging high cost for health care services and taxes and devoting the resources to emergency programs.
State funds for emergency programs.
Emergency medical service fund
References
- Toner E, Waldhorn R, Franco C, Courtney B, Rambhia K, Norwood A, Inglesby TV, O’Toole T. (2009). Hospitals rising to the challenge: The first five years of the U.S. hospital preparedness program and priorities going forward Prepared by the Center for Biosecurity of UPMC for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under Contract No. HHSO100200700038C.
Public Health Emergency. (March 5, 2019). Public Health and Medical Emergency Support for a Nation prepared. Retrieved from
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
In this response, I will address each question separately based on the provided content. I will utilize the information provided in the content and support my answers with references to journal articles.
Answer to Post One:
Based on the key findings mentioned in the content, one can observe a significant improvement in the preparedness of individual hospitals since the implementation of the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP). This improvement ensures that quality and safe services can be provided to patients or victims of disasters. The HPP has equipped individual hospitals with the necessary training and tools to handle emergencies since its start in 2002. Private hospitals and organizations, being community-based, are able to respond quickly to disasters and possess valuable information about their respective communities. The findings presented by UPMC have helped inform the government’s implementation of disaster and response programs, leading to better services for victims in times of emergencies.
Furthermore, the formation of coalitions among emergency response teams has played a crucial role in strengthening disaster preparedness services. By collaborating and coordinating with one another, both private and public hospitals have enhanced the operations of their respective emergency and disaster response teams. This networking has facilitated the sharing and acquisition of training, tools, and resources, resulting in an overall improvement in disaster preparedness. The efforts of both private and public hospitals have significantly contributed to enhancing disaster preparedness and response capabilities.
Regarding the funding sources for a specific hospital mentioned in the content, it is stated that well-established non-profit organizations and the government are part of the funding sources for their emergency management programs. Additionally, grants from individual well-wishers and support from other non-governmental organizations contribute to sustaining the quality level of services provided by the facility. This combination of funding sources enables the hospital to deliver the best quality and safe services to the community.
References:
Toner E, Waldhorn R, Franco C, Courtney B, Rambhia K, Norwood A, Inglesby TV, O’Toole T. (2009). Hospitals rising to the challenge: The first five years of the U.S. hospital preparedness program and priorities going forward Prepared by the Center for Biosecurity of UPMC for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under Contract No. HHSO100200700038C.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response: Strategic Plan 2010 – 2015.
Answer to Post Two:
The focus of this response is on the individual preparedness of hospitals regarding emergencies. The key finding from the Toner et al. document states that the disaster preparedness of individual hospitals has considerably improved throughout the country since the start of the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) (Toner et al., 2009). Before the implementation of the HPP in 2002, individual hospitals had limited emergency preparedness. However, the introduction of this program emphasized the need for hospitals to be prepared and mitigate the impacts of emergencies on their operations.
To address this need, hospitals took several measures to enhance their emergency preparedness. They engaged top leaders, such as CEOs, in planning for disaster preparedness and response. They established situational awareness and communication capabilities to increase efficiency in emergency management. Hospitals also improved their disaster planning dynamics. These efforts resulted in investments to avail resources, coordination with community emergency plans, enhanced planning from coordinators, staff training on specific responsibilities and roles during disasters, and improved communication among hospital departments and external agencies.
Overall, individual hospital preparedness has evolved significantly compared to past perceptions that were less inclined towards emergencies. The HPP has played a crucial role in promoting and guiding hospitals in their efforts to enhance emergency preparedness.
In terms of funding sources for hospital emergency management projects, there are various options available. Hospitals can cover some expenses directly from their facilities, while others require funding from external sources. In the case of emergencies, governments at the state, local, and federal levels can provide funding to facilitate preparedness and protect the social welfare of the population (Public Health Emergency, 2019). Additionally, hospitals can receive funding through competitive grants from state, federal, and private organizations. High costs for healthcare services and taxes can also contribute to emergency program funding. State funds specifically allocated for emergency programs and emergency medical service funds are other potential sources of funding.
References:
Toner E, Waldhorn R, Franco C, Courtney B, Rambhia K, Norwood A, Inglesby TV, O’Toole T. (2009). Hospitals rising to the challenge: The first five years of the U.S. hospital preparedness program and priorities going forward Prepared by the Center for Biosecurity of UPMC for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under Contract No. HHSO100200700038C.
Public Health Emergency. (March 5, 2019). Public Health and Medical Emergency Support for a Nation prepared. Retrieved from [reference link]
