If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur? Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?
You would have a difficult time practicing as a nurse if you believed these to be true. But they are very real beliefs in some cultures.
Differences in cultural beliefs, subcultures, religion, ethnic customs, dietary customs, language, and a host of other factors contribute to the complex environment that surrounds global healthcare issues. Failure to understand and account for these differences can create a gulf between practitioners and the public they serve.
In this Assignment, you will examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and by one other country.
To Prepare:
- Review the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global health agenda and select one global health issue to focus on for this Assignment.
- Select at least one additional country to compare to the U.S. for this Assignment.
- Reflect on how the global health issue you selected is approached in the U.S. and in the additional country you selected.
- Review and download the Global Health Comparison Matrix provided in the Resources.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Global Health Comparison Matrix; 1-page Plan for Social Change)
Part 1: Global Health Comparison Matrix
Focusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:
- Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.
- Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each policy.
- Explain how the social determinants of health may impact the global health issue you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
- Using the WHO’s Organization’s global health agenda as well as the results of your own research, analyze how each country’s government addresses cost, quality, and access to the global health issue selected.
- Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the health of the global population. Be specific and provide examples.
- Explain how the health policy you selected might impact the role of the nurse in each country.
- Explain how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 2: A Plan for Social Change
Reflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment and the impact that global health issues may have on the world, the U.S., your community, as well as your practice as a nurse leader.
In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
- Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
- Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.
- Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.
Global Healthcare Issues and PoliciesPart 1: Global Health Comparison MatrixFocusing on the country you selected and the U.S., complete the Global Health Comparison Matrix. Be sure to address the following:• Consider the U.S. national/federal health policies that have been adapted for the global health issue you selected from the WHO global health agenda. Compare these policies to the additional country you selected for study.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.
Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples are provided.
Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.
Response provides a clear and accurate explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Detailed and accurate supporting examples are provided.
Response provides a clear and complete explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.
Response provides an accurate and detailed explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.Good 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Response provides an explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country.
Response provides an explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country. Specific examples may be provided.
Response provides an explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue.
Response provides an explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population. Supporting examples may be provided.
Response provides an explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse.
Response provides an explanation of how the global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries.Fair 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and another country, and/or the examples, are vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the health of the global population, and/or supporting examples, is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague or incomplete.
Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in each of the two countries is vague or inaccurate.Poor 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of policies in the U.S. and another country is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of how the social determinants of health impact the issue in the U.S. and in another country, and the examples, are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of how the governments of the two countries address cost, quality, and access related to the issue is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of how the policy in each of the two countries impacts the global population, and supporting examples, is missing.
Explanation of how the policies in each country impact the role of the nurse is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of how global health issues impact local healthcare organizations and policies in both countries is missing.Feedback:
The Nurse’s Role in Global HealthcarePart 2: A Plan for Social ChangeReflect on the global health policy comparison and analysis you conducted in Part 1 of the Assignment. In a 1-page response, create a plan for social change that incorporates a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.• Explain how you would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice and role as a nurse leader.• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact your local practice and role as a nurse leader.• Explain how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into your local practice as a nurse leader represents and contributes to social change. Be specific and provide examples.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.
Response provides a clear and thorough explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.
Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Accurate and detailed supporting examples are provided.Good 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Response provides an explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader.
Response provides an explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader.
Response explains how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change. Some supporting examples are provided.Fair 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.
Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague or incomplete.
Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples provided, are vague or incomplete.Poor 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) Explanation of how one would advocate for the incorporation of a global perspective or lens into his/her role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.
Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens might impact local practice and the role as a nurse leader is vague and incomplete, or is missing.
Explanation of how the incorporation of a global perspective or lens in one’s role as a nurse represents and contributes to social change, and/or supporting examples, is missing.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, my responsibility is to design and conduct lectures, evaluate student performance, and provide feedback through examinations and assignments. In this context, I have been assigned to examine a global health issue and consider the approach to this issue by the United States and one other country. The selected health issue is based on the World Health Organization (WHO)’s global health agenda.
Question 1:
If you talk about a possible poor health outcome, do you believe that outcome will occur?
No, I do not believe that a possible poor health outcome will necessarily occur if it is discussed. However, discussing such outcomes may raise awareness and motivate people to take preventive measures or seek effective treatments if required. Ignoring or avoiding discussions about possible poor health outcomes may lead to underestimation of the risks and may result in harmful consequences.
Question 2:
Do you believe eye contact and personal contact should be avoided?
No, I do not believe that eye contact and personal contact should be avoided in general. These actions are an essential part of interpersonal communication and can help to establish trust and build rapport. However, cultural beliefs and individual preferences may vary, and it is essential to respect them. For instance, in some cultures, prolonged eye contact is considered disrespectful, and personal space is highly valued. As a medical professional, it is crucial to be aware of and respect cultural differences and individual preferences while maintaining professional boundaries.
#talk #poor #health #outcome
