Research Critique Guidelines – Part II
Use this document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.
Quantitative Studies
Background
1. Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
1. Discuss how these two articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
2. Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
1. State the methods of the two articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
2. Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one limitation of each method.
Results of Study
1. Summarize the key findings of each study in one or two comprehensive paragraphs.
2. What are the implications of the two studies you chose in nursing practice?
Outcomes Comparison
1. What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
2. How do the outcomes of your chosen articles compare to your anticipated outcomes?
Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.
Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
NOTE: Last Week’s assignment was Qualitative Research and this week is Quantitative Research and the Practice Problem is: Effect of Exercise on the Prevention of Osteoporosis and Associated Fractures in High-Risk Individuals.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, I am responsible for designing and conducting lectures, evaluating student performance, and providing feedback through examinations and assignments for medical college students. In this assignment, I will be focusing on Research Critique Guidelines-Part II and Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique, which entails identifying two quantitative research studies and discussing their significance in nursing practice, ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study, and summarizing the key findings.
Quantitative Studies
Background:
The two articles selected for this critique are “The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Quality of Life and Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Adults with Osteoporosis” by Lee et al. (2013) and “Effectiveness of physical exercise interventions in reducing the risk of falls in older people with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” by Sun et al. (2020).
Lee et al. (2013) aimed to examine the impact of exercise intervention on the quality of life and physical function of community-dwelling adults with osteoporosis. Sun et al. (2020) intended to determine the effectiveness of physical exercise interventions in reducing the risk of falls in older people with and without cognitive impairment. The research questions, in this case, were, “What is the impact of exercise intervention on the quality of life and physical function of community-dwelling adults with osteoporosis?” and “What is the effectiveness of physical exercise interventions in reducing the risk of falls in older people with and without cognitive impairment?”
The two articles support the nurse practice issue of preventing osteoporosis and associated fractures. According to these studies, exercise intervention is effective in improving the quality of life, physical function, and reducing the risk of falls in older people with osteoporosis.
Method of Study:
Lee et al. (2013) conducted a pre- and post-intervention study design with a 12-week exercise intervention program. Meanwhile, Sun et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The significant difference in method design between these two studies is that Lee et al. (2013) employed a pre- and post-intervention approach, while Sun et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
One benefit of the pre- and post-intervention study design is that it captures changes in outcomes over a specific period, which enhances understanding of the impact of the intervention. A limitation, however, is that it is challenging to control for extraneous variables that may affect the outcomes. On the other hand, the benefit of a systematic review and meta-analysis is that it provides a comprehensive view of current evidence on a specific topic. However, the downside is that there may be weakness or bias in the studies analyzed, which may influence the meta-analysis results.
Results of Study:
Lee et al. (2013) found that exercise intervention significantly improved quality of life and physical function, including muscle strength, flexibility, and endurance, in community-dwelling adults with osteoporosis. Sun et al. (2020) found that physical exercise interventions were effective in reducing the risk of falls, particularly in older people with cognitive impairment.
Implications in Nursing Practice:
The two studies indicate that exercise intervention is an effective intervention for preventing osteoporosis and associated fractures, improving the quality of life and physical function of community-dwelling adults with osteoporosis, and reducing the risk of falls in older people with cognitive impairment. The findings support the need for nurses to incorporate exercise intervention in their practice to improve the quality of life and physical function of patients with osteoporosis and reduce the risk of falls in older adults with cognitive impairment.
Outcomes Comparison:
The anticipated outcomes of the PICOT question are that exercise intervention will reduce the risk of osteoporosis and associated fractures, improve the quality of life and physical function of patients with osteoporosis, and reduce the risk of falls in older adults with cognitive impairment. The findings of the two studies align with the expected outcomes, indicating that exercise intervention is an effective intervention for preventing osteoporosis and associated fractures, improving the quality of life and physical function of community-dwelling adults with osteoporosis, and reducing the risk of falls in older people with cognitive impairment.
Ethical Considerations:
In the two studies, ethical considerations centered on obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring their confidentiality, and minimizing harm to participants. Additionally, researchers had to adhere to ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, ensuring that exercise intervention did not cause harm and that the benefits outweigh the risks.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the two studies affirm that exercise intervention is an effective intervention for preventing osteoporosis and associated fractures, improving the quality of life and physical function of community-dwelling adults with osteoporosis, and reducing the risk of falls in older people with cognitive impairment. Nurses can use these findings to inform their practice and improve the quality of life and physical function of patients with osteoporosis. Nevertheless, ethical considerations, such as obtaining informed consent, confidentiality, and minimizing harm, need to be observed during the conduct of the study.
#Research #Critique #Guidelines #Part #document #organize
