Policy Proposal Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

*******The underpreforming benchmark needs to focus on focusing the heart failure readmissions for Mercy Medical Center.****

PREPARATION

After reviewing your benchmark evaluation, senior leaders in the organization have asked you to draft a policy change proposal and practice guidelines addressing the benchmark metric for which you advocated action.

In their request, senior leaders have asked for a proposal of not more than 2–4 pages that includes a concise policy description (about one paragraph), practice guidelines, and 3–5 credible references to relevant research, case studies, or best practices that support your analysis and recommendations. You are also expected to be precise, professional, and persuasive in justifying the merit of your proposed actions.

When creating your policy and guidelines it may be helpful to utilize the template that your current care setting or organization uses. Your setting’s risk management or quality department could be a good resource for finding an appropriate template or format. If you are not currently in practice, or your care setting does not have these resources, there are numerous appropriate templates freely available on the Internet.

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Note: The tasks outlined below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide.

In your proposal, senior leaders have asked that you:

  • Explain why a change in organizational policy or practice guidelines is needed to address a shortfall in meeting a performance benchmark prescribed by applicable local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.
    • What is the current benchmark for the organization? What is the numeric score for the underperformance?
    • How might the benchmark underperformance be affecting the quality of care being provided or the operations of the organization?
    • What are the potential repercussions of not making any changes?
  • Recommend ethical, evidence-based strategies to resolve the performance issue.
    • What does the evidence-based literature suggest are potential strategies to improve performance for your targeted benchmark?
    • How would these strategies ensure improved performance or compliance with applicable local, state, or federal health care laws or policies?
    • How would you propose to apply these strategies in the context of your chosen professional practice setting?
    • How would you ensure that the application of these strategies is ethical and culturally inclusive?
    • Does your policy encompass the key components of your recommendations?
  • Analyze the potential effects of environmental factors on your recommended strategies.
    • What regulatory considerations could affect your recommended strategies?
    • What organizational resources could affect your recommended strategies (for example, staffing, finances, logistics, and support services)?
    • Are your policy and guidelines realistic in light of existing environmental factors?
  • Propose a succinct policy and guidelines to enable a team, unit, or the organization as a whole to implement recommended strategies to resolve the performance issue related to the relevant local, state, or federal health care policy or law.
  • Identify colleagues, individual stakeholders, or stakeholder groups who should be involved in further development and implementation of your proposed policy, guidelines, and recommended strategies.
    • Why is it important to engage these colleagues, individual stakeholders, or stakeholder groups?
    • Do your proposed guidelines help colleagues, individual stakeholders, or stakeholder groups understand how to implement your proposed policy?
    • How might engaging these colleagues, individual stakeholders, or stakeholder groups result in a better organizational policy and smoother implementation?
    • Are your proposal and recommended strategies realistic, given the care team, unit, or organization you are considering?

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
In response to the request from senior leaders at Mercy Medical Center, this proposal aims to address the benchmark metric of heart failure readmissions. The underperformance in this benchmark metric poses challenges to the quality of care provided and the overall operations of the organization. This proposal will outline the need for a change in policy and practice guidelines, along with evidence-based strategies to resolve the performance issue. Additionally, the proposal will analyze the potential effects of environmental factors and propose a succinct policy and guidelines for implementation. Engagement of relevant stakeholders will also be emphasized to ensure successful implementation of the proposed strategies.

1. Explanation of the need for a change in policy or practice guidelines:

The current benchmark for heart failure readmissions at Mercy Medical Center and its corresponding numeric score indicate a significant underperformance. This underperformance has a direct impact on the quality of care being provided and the overall operations of the organization. High readmission rates not only lead to poorer patient outcomes but also result in increased healthcare costs and resource utilization. Failure to address this underperformance may lead to reputational damage for the organization and potentially affect reimbursement rates.

2. Recommendation of ethical, evidence-based strategies to resolve the performance issue:

Evidence-based literature suggests several potential strategies to improve performance in reducing heart failure readmissions. These strategies may include enhancing transitional care programs, implementing comprehensive discharge planning, providing patient education and self-management support, improving medication adherence, and fostering effective care coordination and communication. By implementing these strategies, improved performance and compliance with applicable health care laws or policies can be achieved. In the context of Mercy Medical Center, these strategies can be applied by establishing multidisciplinary care teams, utilizing technology for remote monitoring, coordinating care transitions with community providers, and developing patient-centric interventions. To ensure ethical and culturally inclusive care, these strategies should consider the diverse needs of the patient population, promote health equity, and respect patient autonomy and preferences. The proposed policy encompasses these key components and aligns them with the organization’s mission and values.

3. Analysis of potential effects of environmental factors on recommended strategies:

Several regulatory considerations may influence the implementation of the recommended strategies. These may include compliance with state and federal laws related to patient privacy, reimbursement models, and care coordination standards. Organizational resources such as staffing, finances, technology infrastructure, logistical capabilities, and support services must also be considered. The policy and guidelines should be realistic and feasible in light of these environmental factors. Conducting a thorough assessment of existing resources and potential barriers will help ensure successful implementation of the strategies.

4. Proposal of a succinct policy and guidelines for implementation:

The proposed policy and guidelines aim to enable the entire organization at Mercy Medical Center to implement the recommended strategies for reducing heart failure readmissions. The policy should outline clear objectives, roles and responsibilities, and protocols for assessment, intervention, and evaluation. It should emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration, communication, and continuous quality improvement. The guidelines should provide step-by-step instructions for implementing specific interventions and interventions tailored to individual patient needs. Regular monitoring, data collection, and reporting mechanisms should be established to track progress and identify areas for further improvement.

5. Identification of colleagues, individual stakeholders, or stakeholder groups:

Engaging colleagues, individual stakeholders, and stakeholder groups is crucial for the successful development and implementation of the proposed policy, guidelines, and recommended strategies. Key stakeholders may include physicians, nurses, pharmacists, care coordinators, case managers, patient and family representatives, hospital administrators, and community healthcare providers. Involving these stakeholders is important because their expertise, perspectives, and buy-in are essential for designing effective interventions, ensuring smooth implementation, and promoting sustainable change. The proposed guidelines should provide clear instructions and resources to help these stakeholders understand their roles and responsibilities and effectively contribute to the implementation process. Considering the specific context of Mercy Medical Center and the involved care team, unit, or organization will help ensure the feasibility and practicality of the proposed strategies.

Conclusion:
Addressing the underperformance in heart failure readmissions is crucial for the improvement of patient outcomes and efficient operations at Mercy Medical Center. This proposal highlights the need for a change in policy and practice guidelines, recommends evidence-based strategies, analyzes potential environmental factors, proposes a concise policy and guidelines, and emphasizes the involvement of relevant stakeholders. Implementation of the proposed strategies will not only improve the benchmark metric but also contribute to the overall quality of care provided by the organization.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 7 Assignment 1 – Journal: Schools of Criminology and

  Week 7 Assignment 1 – Journal: Schools of Criminology and Your Career After reviewing the information on criminology and the four schools of criminology, discuss and give an example of how each will influence your selected criminal justice career. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are

Conduct an individual assessment for each of the following body

  Conduct an individual assessment for each of the following body systems: Head Face Eyes Ears Nose Throat Neck You may conduct the assessment on a fellow student, friend, or family member. Remember to secure their permission. Collect both subjective and objective data using the process described in the textbook. Then, document your Subjective & Objective

Case Analysis -Ford Motor Co.

 Analyze a case using the Eight Steps to Sound Decision Making found in Chapter 2 of the textbook. CASE: Read the case, Pinto Fires, on pages 63-67 of your textbook. Please don’t reference any other source than the case provided and the eight steps to ethical decision making found in

Note: Respond to this discussion post. 250 words, 2 references

Note: Respond to this discussion post. 250 words, 2 references and apa format Thank you. Accreditation increases the overall quality of treatment in healthcare facilities. Accreditation programs can also improve person end results in some specialties. This improves the top quality of care by decreasing distinctions in exactly how different

Marketing: behavior change: Read ” Influence: Science & Practice”,

Read ” Influence: Science & Practice”, provides descriptions of and research findings on six widely used interpersonal persuasive approaches. For this assignment, you’re asked to read the entire book and think about the approaches that are described. Write a brief and personal book report; you can organize your report around

workflow diagram – Premium Paper Help

Premium Paper Help is a professional writing service that provides original papers. Our products include academic papers of varying complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials for assistance purposes only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references.

Please read from our Textbook 1, the following Strategic Management

  Please read from our Textbook 1, the following Strategic Management case assigned for this Learning Module and please analyze and answer the following questions: * What’s this Strategic Management Business Case about? * Which are the three most Critical Issues of this Strategic Management Business Case?    Please explain

Assignment Details You work in the human resources department of

  Assignment Details You work in the human resources department of a company that has just undergone a new organizational working team concept (working in virtual teams). You have been chosen as the team leader for a five-member team to design policies and procedures for the newly designed virtual teams

Writing a Research Proposal

https://youtu.be/uyoU4BwTHmo https://youtu.be/PDjS20kic54 In this video, Dr Greg Martin provides an introduction to research methods, methedology and study design. Specifically he takes a look at qualitative and quantitative research methods including case control studies, cohort studies, observational research etc. Directions: A) Discussion #1 is an effort to prepare you for the

Based on what you’ve read and have watched so far

Based on what you’ve read and have watched so far this week. Consider Bartle’s Taxonomy  Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit MUDs by Richard Bartle.” Bartle’s Taxonomy was the earliest attempt to break down player psychology in a multiplayer environment. Richard Bartle, who created the first MUD in 1978, interviewed

If you had the choice to purchase common stock or

If you had the choice to purchase common stock or preferred stock from your company, which would you choose?  Why?  Which is riskier?  Which is the better deal?  Your opinion should be based on your research and cited in APA format. Does Amazon have dividend paying stock or non-dividend paying stock?

This is the first submission for this project. Please select

  This is the first submission for this project. Please select an alteration in health (disease) that you would like to work on. Be sure to select a disease that has enough information and depth to meet the project requirements. Describe the selection in one paragraph and why you chose

Parts A thru C: Follow CAREFUL instructions for each part.

   Parts A thru C: Follow CAREFULinstructions for each part. Label eachpart A, B, and C- Must list references used under each section.*Besure to use current (2018 to 2022), scholarly, peer reviewed nursing journalsto support your posts. A list of approvednursing journals attached under instructions.**NOPLAGIARISM****All attachments forsection A and B